Reductio ad absurdum of welfare

A central Leftist belief is that it is not just to simply leave another person alone, but rather that justice in some circumstances requires a person to actively help another.

That is not an unreasonable principle. For a concentration of people to live in proximity, it is necessary for some forms of positive right to be respected.

But they do insist on taking it to the absurd.

Greeks cannot get money from the banks, because the banks are closed. The banks are closed because they do not have any money. They do not have any money because the ECB (“The Germans”, if you like), have stopped giving them any. The left are describing this situation—Germany not giving Greek banks any more money—as an attack on Greece. By not giving Greece money, Germany is overruling Greek democracy. It is imposing austerity.

You can make a case that if the wealthy of Britain, say, are not paying taxes to fund various generous services and subsidies to the poor of Britain, they are in some way depriving their neighbours and countrymen of something they are entitled to. To be a property-owner within a stable society, arguably, implies duties to that society. It’s hard to see where to draw the line, but it’s not outrageous.

But to posit in the same way, that the people of Germany have the moral duty to fund the people of Greece to live a first-world lifestyle in a third-world economy, is just baseless. They are not fellow-countrymen. They are not neighbours. They do not share a common inheritance from a community of ancestors. Even descending into the swamps of democratic theory, German taxpayers do not get to vote for the Greek government. It’s just blatantly insane. There is no starting point for an argument to begin to work towards that conclusion.

By making or supporting that claim, leftists are undermining their more supportable claims for egalitarian policies within societies. If they can argue for Germans to subsidise Greeks, then there is no conceivable limit to the level of charity they will consider a moral necessity. Therefore whatever level they do argue for must be opposed; since they clearly cannot themselves limit their demands, their demands must be limited for them.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Reductio ad absurdum of welfare

  1. anonymous says:

    A moral argument would probably stem from the way that the German economy has benefited from a unified European currency. Certainly it’s a less compelling argument than the practical ones.

    Like

  2. Barzini says:

    This is just wrong…….

    Germany isn’t giving Greece any money. Germany isn’t a currency issuer. the ECB is the currency issuer.

    The ECB creates new Euros from nothing, free of any cost, just like the US Federal government does, just like the Japanese government does, etc….

    When the Euro was introduced, European countries stopped being currency issuers and became currency users (eg like the State of California). It’s vital that the currency issuer (US government in case of California, ECB in case of Euro) is willing and capable to provide transfers of money during times of crisis (anti-cyclical investment).

    There is nothing wrong with Greece, it has the same population, resources and industries as it always had, all it lacks is computer generated money to stimulate demand.

    The only risk of providing such money is inflation. However, given mass unemployment and huge unused capacity, there is little chance of that in Greece just now.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s